🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.6/5 from 780+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.6 out of 5 (780 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$74.99​
$124.98
Sale
βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Neckline : Crew neckPattern : PrintArticle number : 04B22O00C-Q11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift distribution
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top

Neckline : Crew neck
Pattern : Print
Article number : 04B22O00C-Q11

This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 884199

Category: Men > Clothing > T-shirts & Polos

Original Price: $124.98 USD

Sale Price: $74.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand recent

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.6
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9436 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific find!
The CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top works fine for my personal use.​
38 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
incredibly happy
The CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top works solely fine.
26 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase 
5 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable for my needs
From my experience, the CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top works fine so no complaints.
43 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson
7 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
it does the job and I don’t regret it.​
30 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top
After a few use, the CITEE TEE - Long sleeved top feels solid which is good enough. distribution was normal.
22 people found this helpful