🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 813+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (813 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ at no charge fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

In good condition no-cost fulfillment

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid fulfillment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver

In good condition complimentary fulfillment

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 750666

Category: Vintage > Electronics > Radios

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ no-cost dispatch on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7169 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
Personally, it works fine and it meets expectations.
12 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
In daily use, the Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver is practical which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 day ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
exceptional
So far, the Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver is doing its job.
37 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted
For the price, the Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver does its job so it’s acceptable.
35 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 days ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly suggest!
Smooth transaction and good Radio Shack Pro -71 Scanner Receiver.
50 people found this helpful