🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 590+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Tweezerman, enduring Lash Curler, Rosegold

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5 (590 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$6
$10
Sale
βœ“ no-cost fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

merely-arrived, in damaged box. Retails for $18

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid delivery

↩️
functional Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold

latest, in damaged box. Retails for $18​

This product is exceptional for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 153521

Category: Beauty > Tools & Accessories > Tweezers

Original Price: $10 USD

Sale Price: $6 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2931 reviews
AW​
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fantastic quality
The Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold is usable.
36 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· San Diego, CA

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest
This Tweezerman, iconic Lash Curler, Rosegold is worth buying.
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Super happy
I wouldn’t say it’s excellent, but the Tweezerman, vintage Lash Curler, Rosegold is reliable.
19 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
purely what I wanted
To be fair, the Tweezerman, timeless Lash Curler, Rosegold performs as expected and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
39 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely outstanding
So far, the Tweezerman, retro Lash Curler, Rosegold is straightforward to use which is good enough.
3 people found this helpful